Strategic Analysis Of Nestle Company Management Essay

Strategic Analysis Of hold c dawdle Company Management EssayThe purpose of this paper is to diminutively guess the strategical decisions that nourish occurred over the corporate autobiography of Nestle menti unityd in the case and to what bound has Mergers and Acquisitions and Strategic Alliances played a role in NESTLEs schema in that period. In assign to evaluate these strategic decisions, the paper shall out by- pipeline Nestls historical strategic decisions give a brief translation of each decision and how mergers and skills contributed to the call onth of the confederation.The paper goes on to explain the authentic strategies of Nestl and how sustainable these strategies may be in the time to come. It explains the rationalisation of these certain strategies and the bran-new strategies that ought to be developed.The paper then looks at the succeeding(a) strategies of Nestle to outline the issues that atomic number 18 likely to be faced when these strategies ar e implemented .Likely actions are then suggested which may help give solutions to problems faced by Nestle on implementation of its future strategies.The strategic decisions get new proceeds development, extensive research development and procession into new harvest-time category which were more often than non achieved by and through with(predicate) mergers and acquirements.The current system was noted as unsustainable in the want term due to the particular that most of the harvest-tides of Nestl cannot be classified as healthy .The suggestion do was that Nestle should come up with strategies that will make them healthier than their competitors.Nestls future strategies were similarly scrutinized and possible solutions condition to exceed roughly of the strategic implementation issues the organization is likely to face.1. Evaluate the strategic decisions that have occurred over the corporate history of NESTLE menti unmatchedd in the case and to what extent has Merger s and Acquisitions and Strategic Alliances played a role in NESTLEs strategy in that period? Expansion cor resolve to Bell and Shelman (2009), Nestls sales strained rapidly crossways Europe a few years after its inception. The come with started developing an international character, and in 1905 it took the strategic decision of acquiring its main(prenominal) competitor, the Anglo-Swiss Condensed coming back out confederation (Bell and Shelman, 2009). The Federal Trade Commission refers to this as a horizontal merger where a firm acquires a former competitor allowing for a consolidation of companies in the same industry (Barney, 2011). As a result, Nestle in the early 1900s began location itself as a powdery milk, and infant food company. Furthermore, the combined companies through the Nestle brand name continued to grow through product and market place extension mergers.Barney (2011) describes a product extension merger as one which adopts a complementary product through a n acquisition, as seen in the case of Nestle which aligned product adoption in categories such as sugar, milk, cocoa and coffee. Nestl further undertook market extension mergers which involve promoteing entry into complementary markets through acquisitions (Barney, 2011) whereby Nestle tangle withed the confectionary, coffees, cereals, soft drink ins, ice cream, water and prepared foods markets (See Ansoff Matrix below).Ansoff (1965) would argue that Nestl uses 4 different approaches to grow its products and markets. To explain the reasoning behind Nestls past MAs they can be delegate into these categories of evolution which include market penetration, product development, market development and diversification (See Ansoff Matrix above).During the 1920s, Nestle diversify its portfolio from infant formula to include Milo. This was its first powdered drink not created for infants. Spanning from 1938 to 1948, Nestl made the decision to enter into coffee and tea sector with the lau nch of Nescafe and Nestea. Nestle also diversified into the confectionary market, prepared foods, water, pet foods, nada bar and weight loss markets with the acquisitions of Peter, Cailler, Kohler Swiss Chocolate Company, Maggi, Vittel, F insecurityies, Powerbar and Jenny Craig respectively. Diversification outside the food and drink industry to enter pharmaceuticals and cosmetics was executed in the 1970s when it became a minority shareholder of LOreal (25%) and later acquired Alcon Laboratories. Barney (2011) highlights that acquiring new companies leads to reduction in production or distribution costs through economies of scale and erect integration.Mergers and Acquisitions are also beneficialIn falsify magnitude market shareFor industry know how and positioningFor Financial leveraging (See appendix 3)Reasonable for this industryTo improve profitability and EPS (See disclose 2 for EPS 2006 and 2007) arising Lasserre (2012)According to Lasserre (2012), MAs can also create sev eral types of protects for a company. He argues that they are excusable if the economic value of the two entities is worth more combined than the sum of independent value earlier the merger (2012). Thus, the businesses must create shared economic values through synergy by increasing revenues whilst decreasing costs. Lasserre assumes these created values can be both short-term (one-off value) and spacious-term (synergistic effects).Diversification and global eye socket were the main values created for Nestl in its acquisitions. For spokesperson, Carnation enabled Nestle to extend not only in its product range but also to go along new areas around the world. The following table outlines the values created through Nestls MAs.Nestls MAsValue createdAnglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company ConsolidationMaggi DiversificationAcquisitions in canned and rigid foods, water, ice cream and pets food DiversificationAlcon Laboratories Diversification Options (to monitor the evolution of th e technology)Carnation Global reach DiversificationRalston-Purina DiversificationJenny Craig DiversificationNovartiss Gerber Global reach Options (to monitor the evolution of the technology)Table Nestls MAs and their value created.Source Authors own public based on discipline from Bell and Shelman (2009) and Lasserre (2012).Furthermore, the relationship in the midst of Nestle and LOreal developed further when they created two joint-ventures Galderma and Laboratories Inneov. According to Barney (2011), joint ventures are undertaken in devote to take risk, share costs, and enter into new markets and industries. It is assumed that Nestle saw the benefits of alliances rather than acquisitions into the cosmetics market due to its leave out of knowledge on the industry.Once Nestl diversified its portfolio, they followed-up by expanding brands through what Ansoff (1965) refers to as market penetration. In order to utilise its current resources, and take advantage of the market o pportunities created by Milo and Nescafe, Nestle developed new brands such as Nesquik and Nespresso (Bell and Shelman, 2009). Additionally, Nestl acquired more brands consistent with its presence in the water and pet foods market e.g. Vittel and Friskies. According to Ansoff (1965), market development is the introduction of existing products into new markets. This can be seen through Nestls acquisitions of Stouffer, which enabled the company to sell its food products to different markets frozen prepared meals.Lastly, Nestle used product development to aver new products such as Buitoni, Carnation, and Kit Kat to grow within its existing market of food, powdered drinks and confectionary.Nestls diverse portfolio provides it with a competitive advantage, and has enabled the company to become the worlds puffyst food and Beverage Company (Bell and Shelman, 2009). However, it seems that near product diversifications through mergers and acquisitions led to the bulge outfall of its acqu ire especially visible in the years leash up to Mauchers administration (Bell and Shelman, 2009). Barney (2011) suggests that mergers and acquisitions between strategically unrelated businesses do not necessarily create prodigious economic profits. Thus, it can be assumed that Nestls strategically unrelated acquisition of Alcon and partial acquisition of LOreal between 1974 and 1977, contributed to a decline in profits between 1978 and 1981.Supply Chain RationalisationAs Nestle grew and entered new markets, they worked towards horizontally integrating their supply chain. According to Christopher (2005), companies such as Nestle taste to spread geographically, whilst reducing costs through economies of scale by prioritising manucircumstanceuring and operational processes. This can be seen end-to-end the 1900s as Nestle invests in its value chain by opening affect plants within the U.S., Britain, Germany and Spain manu incidenturing in Australia warehouses in Singapore, Hong Kong and Bombay and particularories in the U.S. and Brazil (Bell and Shelman 2009) (See Nestls value chain).Firm infrastructureDecentralized organization administrator Committee consists of the CEO and 12 top managersThe company is structured through 43 regional organisations inform to take awayors of three geographic zones (zone Europe, Asia/Oceania/Africa and zone Americas).Country managers are given a large degree of self-sufficiency when handwritinging with customer matters.Nestls Value chainHuman Resource ManagementFocus on developing local managementInvestment in training and providing cross experiencesPeople start from the shadow and move their way up in the organisationUnique culture/ focus on long term resultsDeveloping people from acquired companies.Technology DevelopmentStrong RD platform/ open innovation copyBig investment in RD (investment to retain pharmaceutical businesses and food, nutriment, health and wellness)Creating an innovation acceleration team to suppor t rapid product introductions.Initiating a common technology infrastructure/ a comprehensive information establishment named the orb.MarginProcurementPurchasing approximately raw materials sooner of touch them in-house.60% of materials purchases from acclivitous economies commit sourcing -In developing countries agri heathen commodities are bought from local markets and often directly from farmers- rather than on the world marketServiceJenny Craig -personal nutrition counselling / Jenny Direct website and phone /Home delivery.Personalized go 24/7 service though telephone and internet help line for Nestls subsidy products.Marketing salesPositioning the company as healthyStrong brands product and brand differentiation. traffic directly with consumers.Medical nutrition market to professionalsOutbound LogisticsSynchronization of data between manufacturing and retailers- through the existence system.Introducing new distribution channels for few brands (e.g. Nespresso corners , boutiques and home delivery)Inbound LogisticsWare-HousingOperations-Manufacturing, food processing plants-Producing locally-About half of the factories are in developing countries/ production for the local market.-Partnership with local farmers -providing advice and support-Implementing fictitious character control processes.Moreover, Nestle made the strategic decision of establishing local supply chains which meant deploying its agricultural capabilities down tothe farm level through strategic alliances. This is referred to as their milk district modeling which allows farmers to supply milk to the company directly and in ex miscellanea Nestle provides its resources and know-how, such as providing storage and chilling facilities (Nestle, 2012). This highlights the fact that Nestle was seeking to establish its value chain activities, or Global business system, earlier on in its history (See value chain above). According to Hill and Hill (2009), this type of model has the talent of reinforcing a companys competitive advantage as it is able to overcome barriers to integration, better respond to delivery speed, change sharing of information and reduce costs of production (Bell and Shelman, 2009).Adapting to a Global RoleNestle prize that for it to sustain its competitive advantage it needed to establish a global technological platform to induce data, manage information and create knowledge (Bell and Shelman, 2009). Consequently Brabeck made the strategic decision of initiating the GLOBE system. victimization this common technological infrastructure, it would be able to share information amongst all Nestls businesses and allowed for a synchronising of data in its supply chain (Bell and Shelman 2009).Refocused dodge alimentation, Health and WellnessNutrition has always been an constituent(a) part of Nestls mess, dating back to its first nutritious infant formula. However, due to Nestls acknowledgement of consumers existence increasingly aware of the lin k between food, health and personal wellbeing, there has been more of a shift away from a technology and processing- set image towards health and wellness (Bell and Shelman 2009). Under Brabecks tenure, a Nutrition Strategic Business Division was created, along with the acquisitions of Proteika, Musashi (nutrition business), Jenny Craig (diet centres) and Novartis Medical Nutrition (Bell and Shelman 2009).Restructuring of Research and Development tender unitNestl also made a strategic decision of restructuring its RD unit to satisfy customer inevitably and intragroup growth. This was by shifting away from diminished decentralized units set up globally to limited large resource-intensive centres. This was done to renovate old brands by finding multiple uses for its product. Under Brabecks tenure, a 60/40 preference rating system was introduced where products were either discontinued or sold if they did not achieve the 60% level. This was done in order to ameliorate the companys performance and market orientation (Bell and Shelman, 2009).2. To what extent is the current strategy of NESTLE competitively sustainable in the future? How should it be rationalised and what new strategies ought to be developed in the future?Current strategyNestls current strategy was to achieve worldwide sustainable combat through four strategic pillars low cost, efficient trading operations, renovation and innovation of the Nestle product line, habitual availability and improved communication with consumers through better branding. They also had a vision of transforming the company from a technology-and processing-driven food and beverage company towards a vision of nutrition, health and wellness. (Bell and Shelman, 2009, p.3).Nestls current strategy of reorganizing its operations did come as an advantage as in some cases moved away from its agricultural and processing roots to buying the ingredients from outside suppliers (Bell and Shelman, 2009). This can be argued on the ba sis of Nestl reducing the steps of its value chain activities as Brabeck explained some of these activities could not add value to some businesses. An example would be the fact that Nestl exited from cocoa roasting but still carried on producing chocolate. This in turn reduced the costs and made the value chain more efficient. In fact, in scathe of strategic operations, Lasserre (2012) argues that making fundamental changes in the value chain can lead to developing new products and services which can help a company sustain its in advance(p) advantage. Moreover, to enhance the reliability of its suppliers, Nestl implemented a strategy of forming partnerships with its suppliers by creating direct links with them and providing them with support and technical advice. This helped the company cope with the volatility of the supply market and enhance its operations. Therefore, in terms of operational efficiency, Nestl can be seen to be sustainably competitive.Secondly, Nestls current str ategy was focused on renovating and innovating its product line through reorganizing its RD. Lasserre (2012) suggests that organizations such as Nestl could be trying to gain a critical mass advantage. He further explains that in order to achieve this, a minimum amount of resources involve to be mobilized for an activity to perform efficiently and effectively. Hence, Nestls shift from decentralized units of RD to few large resource-intensive centres. As a result of its RD centralization, Nestl was able to reinvigorate old brands an example was finding multiple uses of the Nesquik brand from not only being a powder but to also parade it as syrup and into energetic to drink varieties. However, this strategy came at a disadvantage to Nestl as they lost the benefits of decentralization. These benefits include proximity to markets which gives a firm the ability to create products that fit local customer specificities, gaining access to geographical clusters of knowledge creation and d evelopment access to good-quality scientists and the capability of a firm to learn from different market and cultures (Lasserre, 2012). Therefore, in terms of its RD strategy, it could be argued that Nestl will have trouble sustaining its competitive advantage in the future since part of its future strategy is to expand to other markets.Thirdly, with the introduction of GLOBE in the mid-2000s, Nestle initiated an era of capturing data by tying all of Nestls entities in concert under a common technological platform. This led to the company standardizing its data to manage its vast information and create and share knowledge among its Strategic business units, manufacturers and retailers. The main idea was to use shared knowledge to enhance the collaboration between all the different units of the company which can reduce costs and produce value all over the organisation. Bauwens (2012) outlines this as a social innovation where knowledge is shared and can be used by others. A good exam ple would be the fact that the Globe system allowed for a synchronization of data leading to an proceeds in order fulfilment between manufacturers and retailers. This has allowed Nestl to sustain its competitive advantage by adapting much faster to change and delivering value to customer (Lasserre, 2012). Therefore, knowledge sharing has the potential to play a big role in helping Nestl asseverate its competitive advantage. Nestls final strategic pillar of improving communication between the organization and consumers through better branding could signify the companys efforts to differentiate its products. Barney (2011) would argue that Nestl could be trying to emasculate perceptions of current and potential consumers by altering its product features. In fact, Nestl focused on reducing blubber and calories as well as incorporating healthy and natural ingredients into a wide range of products. It could be argued also that better branding is linked to its vision of moving from a f ood and beverage company to a wellness, health and nutrition company. This could also be Nestls way of differentiating its products by fetching advantage of its reputation in the marketplace as a leading company in its industry. Therefore, customers would, in the long term, respond positively to the companys efforts of producing healthier products. Thus, if Nestl actually succeeds in changing peoples perceptions and position itself as a health driven company, it can manage to maintain its competitive advantage in the future.It is through these four strategic pillars that Nestl derives its current model, the Nestl model, which refers to the companys long term of objectives of organic growth (target of 5% and 6% each year), continuous yearly improvement in EBIT and improve crownwork management which determines the assets of the company against the profit it generates (Bell and Shelman, 2009). The company seems to be achieving its objective as it has some improved its earnings before interest and taxes as seen in exhibit 6 it has slightly made progress in its capital management through its improved return on capital employed as seen in accessory 2 and it has been able to achieve its objective of organic growth between 5% and 6% except for 3 years between 1996 -2007 years also augurd in Exhibit 6.Therefore, it is safe to assume that Nestls current strategy is competitively sustainable in the present however it remains to be seen if it can be successful in the future with its new vision . This is due to the fact that Nestl is possibly trying to implement both product differentiation and cost leading strategies. Porter (1980) defines such firms as stuck in the middle (Barney, 2011). On the one hand, three of its strategic pillars indicate the companys intention of becoming a cost leader through low cost operations, restructuring its product line and efficiently managing its knowledge.On the other hand, it wants to differentiate its whole portfolio of products a nd services by changing the product features or by diversifying their products. Porter (1980) cited in Barney 2011 further explains that if a firm tries to implement both strategies then one of them will fail. He continues to add that for a firm to be economically superior in a single industry then they need to sell at a high price and have small market share (product differentiator) or sell at a low price and gain significant market share (cost leader) therefore Nestl needs to decide which of the two it wants to become . As a result, a lot of their organizational requirements such as organizational structure and management control systems are stuck in the middle for example the fact that certain products need to be managed globally especially in the nutrition division while others are locally managed.Nestls current strategy could be rationalized by foregoing their vision of being a nutrition, health and wellness organization. Instead they should focus on being more of a healthier f ood and beverages company as a cost leader with its current Nestl model. First of all, if Nestl was to pursue a health, nutrition and wellness strategy Nestl would then have to restructure its product portfolio by getting rid of its unhealthy products such as Hot Pockets, and Kit-Kat. In exhibit 8 it can be seen that these products do not deliver growth to the company yet in exhibit 9 they seem to have a higher market share. This shows that the unhealthy products are in fact the cash cows of Nestl which indicate that they are the foundation of the company. It should try and follow Unilevers example of focusing on its core products.Therefore, Nestl should frame new strategies and make changes to its vision. Instead of holding on to unrealistic goals, the company could depot itself in the market as becoming healthier than the competition. In fact, Nestl has already implemented this approach in the past with several products by introducing some nutritional improvements. As an example, Nestl reduced ice-cream fat by 50% and calories by 30% for Dreyers Slow Churned ice-creams and added healthy ingredients to some chocolate snacks (Bell and Shelman 2009). This indicates that the company has the resources needed to deploy this move strategy.The company should also revaluate its SWOT analysis in terms of switching its vision to Health, Nutrition and Wellness. (refer to Appendix 2)Indeed, the strong RD platform enables Nestl to produce more healthy products while maintaining its taste. Moreover, Nestl has the capabilities of doing so with its open innovation model (global network with 5,000 scientists and technologists as well as RD centres worldwide) which enables the company to maximize its chances of coming up with new and innovative products.3. With regards to future strategies what are the strategic implementation issues likely to be faced by the company and what actions should they take to overcome them?Future strategiesOne of the future strategies of Nestl is to grow internally instead of growing through mergers and acquisition. Implementing this strategy could be catastrophic for the company as its growth has been largely relying on acquisitions and joint ventures. Nestl would also lose the benefits of using joint ventures, strategic alliances and acquisitions (Appendix 4). This would then imply that Nestl would have to use its own resources and core competencies to expand so placing a largeer risk on the business. It can also have a forbid impact on the liquidity position of the company.A way in which this issue could be overcome is by applying both strategies. By applying both strategies, the company would be able to spread its corporate risk and share its costs as its return on capital employed still continues to generate profits for the company. Additionally, Nestl has managed to build strong foundations through mergers and acquisitions which has led it to improve its financial position. As seen on Exhibit 4, the acquisition of b usinesses has increased from 447 million in 2006 to 456 million in 2007 which has improved its cash flow. Therefore, in order to maintain a strong position, Nestl should carry on with mergers and acquisitions as well as growing internally.Another of the future strategies initiated by Bulcke is to shift the structure of Nestl from an organisation by country to an organisation by business through sharing best practices using GLOBE (Bell and Shelman 2009, p.10). He argues that this would enable Nestl to start managing its operations globally instead of adapting to every market. However, using the McKinsey 7s framework, many issues can be foreseen as seen on the table below.FactorStrategy Produce variety of quality products, wide variety of brands. Focus on nutrition, health and wellness. 4 strategic pillars (low cost, efficient operations, renovation and innovation of the Nestle product line, universal availability and improved communication with consumers through better branding) (Bel l and Shelman, 2009, p. 3)Structure Decentralised and relatively flat organisational structure which helps to cater for local needs thus increasing flexibility. organized by country/ every country is like a small earth It has operations worldwide through strategic business units.System Comprehensive information system the GLOBE Employees move from the bottom up in the organisation.Style Democratic leadership style managers are given autonomy to take decisions. As such, they feel a sense of belonging in the organisation staff Nestl maintains local companies with regional staff in local markets as they better understand the needs of customers. 43 regional organisations. More than 275,000 employees. It has a pool of experts- its staff consists of scientists, technologists from top universities (Bell and Shelman, 2009, p. 6)Skills Nestls competitive advantage is its RD. It has a high level of technology (23 Product Technology Centres), anda network of experts around the world. (Bell an d Shelman, 2009, p. 9).Shared set Deliver long term value to shareholders. Focus on long term results. Unwritten culture strong personal culture (Bell and Shelman, 2009, p. 8).Although the change in the structure and the strategy was supported with a change in systems by adapting the GLOBE, other elements of the framework have not been adapted. For instance, the style used by Nestl was a democratic leadership style where management in the different countries are given a great deal of autonomy. By changing to a more centralized and global management style some internal resistance from the people can emerge. The different markets are used to operating as small kingdoms (Bell and Shelman 2009, p.10). Therefore, given that country managers in the different countries were used to be given a great deal of freedom especially when dealing with issues related directly to the customer, this new strategy can produce some internal problems for Nestl.To overcome this issue, other elements of t he 7s framework have to be adapted. The main element that links everything together is shared values. Nestl has to work on making changes to its internal culture by introducing new shared values between its people. Implementing the GLOBE is not enough to implement the new strategy, a culture of sharing information and best practices should also be introduced and reinforced. Nestl should teach its people to move from a management style of taking control and matters into their own hands to a style of sharing control and producing decisions globally and collectively.The implementation of this approach may differ across countries due to the cross-cultural differences between countries. According to Lasserre (2012), country specific cultural values influence managerial values and assumptions in an organisation. As an example, Lasserre (2012) illustrates that occidental countries are more individualist while Asian countries are collectivists which heavily impacts how business is done in these countries. In terms of implementing a culture of sharing, it can be assumed that Asian countries would respond more positively to the change than western countries. Nestl intends to achieve its future growth by implementing four platforms for growth which are health, nutrition and wellness (to be the centrepiece), emerging markets, out of home consumption and premiumisation of existing products. (Bell and Shelman, 2009).The aforementioned strategy for growth is expected to simulacrum Nestls sales in the next 10 years. (Bell and Shelman, 2009) Bulcke emphasized that the priority should be on health, nutrition and wellness to implement the vision into every product segment and every country. This vision is in line with Brabecks strategies of going beyond food to Nutrition, Health and Wellness (Bell and Shelman, 2009). The sum total sales for Nestl Nutrition segment has importantly increased from 5,964 million in 2006 to 8,434 in 2007, which represents an improvement of 41% as shown in Exhibit 11.Although total sales have increased, most products that have led to this increase in sales were unhealthy. So, in order to maintain its vision as a Health, Nutrition and Wellness, Nestl should give up its unhealthy products in the long term. However, this would negatively impact on the financial position of the company as these are its core products. Moreover, making the same products available in every market might not be adapted to the needs of every customer in terms of tastes, preferences and nutritional value so Nestl should make sure at least every different product are tailored to the needs of every different market. Regarding emerging markets, Bulcke found out that these markets are growing at a faster pace and therefore Nestl should commingle further into it as there is a high potential for growth. The implementation of popularly position products (PPP), a strategy designed for low income earners so they can afford good nutrition products on a daily bas is, is ex